Data Governance

The rules determining who may change what, how changes are reviewed, and how they are recorded. The control that stops a designed system from drifting back to whatever it was before.

What it assigns

Decision rights and accountabilities. Who may create a field, who may change a definition, who is answerable when a definition proves unfit. Describing it as a data quality project misidentifies both the work and its output — quality is a consequence of governance, not a substitute for it.

Quality means fitness for use

The data quality literature establishes that quality is multidimensional and defined by the consumer's use, not by accuracy alone. An owner field can be accurate and useless if it populates after routing has already fired. An industry value can be complete and useless if two teams read it differently.

Dimensions worth measuring separately
DimensionA concrete failureHow to test it
AccuracyStale employee countsSample against an external source
TimelinessEnrichment lands after routingCompare populate time to consume time
CompletenessRouting fields empty on inboundNull rate on fields rules read
InterpretabilityTwo teams read a stage differentlyAsk three people to define it
AccessibilityData sales cannot queryTrace the consumer's actual path

Source: Dimension framing per the data quality literature

Fitting a configuration

  1. Identify consumers and uses first. For each data domain, list who consumes it and for what decision. Governance without an identified consumer has no fitness criterion and defaults to accuracy.

  2. Write down the contingency factors that apply: size, how centralised decisions are, how standardised processes are, regulatory exposure, diversity of business models. This is the step a template skips.

  3. Assign decision rights domain by domain rather than uniformly. Account data and pipeline data often warrant different configurations in the same company.

  4. Govern the flow before the stock. Entry controls, ownership at creation and definitional change control set the steady state; cleanup only sets the initial condition.

  5. Re-examine when a contingency factor changes — an acquisition, a new segment, a move to self-serve invalidates a configuration fitted to the previous state.

The failure mode to watch

Governance evaluated on its own outputs — standards published, records corrected, meetings held — is measuring activity. The question it should answer is whether the data supported a decision better than before.

RELATED TERMS

COMMON QUESTIONS

What is data governance in revenue operations?
The assignment of decision rights and accountabilities over data: who may create or define a field, who may change it, and who is answerable for whether it is fit for use. It is an authority structure, not a cleanup project.
Is there a standard data governance model?
No. Research on governance design finds configuration is contingent on organisational factors — size, centralisation, process standardisation, regulatory exposure — rather than universal. A model imported wholesale from another company is fitted to that company's contingencies.
Why do data cleanup projects not stick?
Because cleanup addresses the stock while the process keeps producing the flow. Without decision rights over what enters the system, the corrected state decays at the rate defects are generated.
Do we need a data governance council?
A council is a coordination mechanism, appropriate where decision rights genuinely span functions. Where a single owner would be faster, standing one up produces meetings instead of authority.

WHERE THIS HAS BEEN APPLIED

Client work and research from RevOps HQ, our consulting practice.

FURTHER READING

Learn how to apply this: CRM Admin 101

Definitions are the vocabulary. The courses are where you learn to operate it, with the interactive audit tools.

See the course