Marketing Influenced Pipeline

Pipeline where marketing touched the account at some point, without necessarily having originated it.

The most inflatable metric in B2B

With a broad enough definition of a touch, marketing influences nearly everything — an email opened, a page visited, a webinar attended by anyone at the account. The number rises with instrumentation rather than with contribution.

Define the touch or do not report it

State what counts as influence and over what window. Undefined, the metric measures how much tracking you have installed.

How to make it defensible

  1. Define what counts as a touch, in writing, and state the window. An email opened eleven months before the opportunity is not influence in any useful sense.

  2. Report influenced alongside sourced, never instead of it. Sourced is the harder claim and the more informative one.

  3. Express it as a percentage of total pipeline and watch that percentage. If it approaches 100% the definition is too broad to carry information.

  4. Compare the conversion rate of influenced against non-influenced pipeline. If they are the same, the influence is not doing what the metric implies.

  5. Hold the definition constant across periods. Most dramatic movements in this metric are definition changes rather than performance changes.

Where it misleads

  • With a broad enough definition of a touch, marketing influences nearly everything, and the metric stops distinguishing anything.

  • It is correlational by construction. Marketing touching an opportunity that closed does not establish that the touch mattered.

  • It is the easiest metric in the stack to inflate without dishonesty, simply by widening the window or the touch definition.

  • Reporting only influenced pipeline hides a weak sourced number, which is usually why it is the one being reported.

RELATED TERMS

COMMON QUESTIONS

What is marketing influenced pipeline?
Pipeline where marketing touched the account at some point, without necessarily having originated it. It is a much broader and weaker claim than sourced pipeline, and with a loose enough definition of a touch it approaches 100% of all pipeline — at which point it carries no information.
What is the difference between influenced and sourced pipeline?
Sourced attributes the opportunity to whoever originated the first contact — a specific, harder claim. Influenced counts any opportunity marketing touched at any point. Influenced figures are always larger and much weaker evidence, which is why they should be reported alongside sourced rather than instead of it.
Is influenced pipeline a useful metric?
Only with a written definition of what counts as a touch and over what window, and only reported next to sourced. Bounded that way it shows marketing's breadth of contribution, including the mid-funnel work that sourced misses. Unbounded, it is the most inflatable metric in B2B and it tells you nothing.
Why did our influenced pipeline jump?
Check the definition and the attribution window before investigating performance. Most large movements in this metric are caused by a widened touch definition, a longer lookback window, or a new channel being included — none of which are disclosed alongside the number by default.

FURTHER READING

Learn how to apply this: RevOps 101: Revenue Operations Foundations

Definitions are the vocabulary. The courses are where you learn to operate it, with the interactive audit tools.

See the course